The Pros And Cons Of Using Your Inner Critic In Your Songwriting Process

Most songwriters treat the inner critic like a problem to be solved. Silence it, outrun it, drown it out with enough enthusiasm and it’ll leave you alone.

It won’t and you wouldn’t want it to either.

You see, that very voice that tells you the second verse is lazy is the same voice that eventually makes you a better writer.

It’s not the existence of your inner critic that is the issue here, it’s the very fact that it always seems to show up at the wrong time say… halfway through a first draft, when what you needed was a bit of momentum.

What Your Inner Critic Is Actually Good At

Three things, mainly…

It’s a filter. Not every song you write deserves to be finished, and fewer still deserve to be recorded. Something has to make that call, and if you don’t have an internal standard doing it, you’ll end up with a hard drive full of half-songs you can’t rank against each other.

It’s a reviser. This is where it earns its keep. A line that scans wrong, a rhyme that’s doing the work instead of the meaning, a chorus that arrives too late. You can’t fix what you can’t hear, and the critical part of your brain is the part that hears it.

It gives you distance. Songwriting is close work. You’ve been living inside the song for hours or weeks and you’ve lost all sense of whether it lands. The ability to step back and read your own lyric like a stranger is rare and worth practising.

Where It Goes Wrong

The damage almost always comes from timing rather than content.

You sit down with an idea, write four words, and something in you says that’s been done before. So you stop. Not because the criticism was wrong, but because it arrived before there was anything to criticise. Do that enough times and you stop sitting down at all.

Then there’s the loop. You rewrite the same line eleven times, each version a bit worse than the last, and you can no longer tell which one was good. That’s a great example of your inner critic left running with nothing useful to do.

And there’s the slow erosion. Constant self-criticism, especially the kind that drifts from this line is weak into I’m not much of a writer, will eventually stop you sharing anything.

Plenty of good songwriters have a drawer full of finished songs nobody has heard, and it’s rarely because the songs weren’t ready.

An overactive critic makes you cautious, and cautious songs are technically fine and completely forgettable. You take the odd chord out, soften the honest line, round off the edge that would have made someone sit up.

What’s left is… safe.

Separate The Two Jobs

The fix is not balance as balance suggests you do both at once, a bit of each, and that’s exactly why it doesn’t work.

The fix is separation. Writing and editing are two different jobs, and you do them at different times.

When you’re generating, generate. Bad lines, obvious rhymes, placeholder words, doesn’t matter. Nothing is being judged yet because the judging happens later. If a critical thought arrives, note it somewhere and keep going.

When you’re editing, edit properly. Different session, and if you can manage it, a different physical setup. Some writers draft longhand and revise on screen.

Personally, I draft either on the guitar or piano and revise away from the instrument, because I’ve noticed I forgive a weak lyric if I’m enjoying playing it.

Whatever the split is for you, make it a real one. The point is to give your brain a signal about which job it’s doing. A day between the two is better than an hour. A week is better still.

Learn The Difference Between Two Voices

Not all self-criticism is the same, and it helps to know which one is talking.

Useful criticism is specific and about the work. The second verse repeats the first. That rhyme is forcing the line. The title doesn’t appear anywhere in the chorus. You can act on all of it.

Unhelpful criticism is vague and about you. This is terrible. Who do you think you are. Someone’s already written this better. None of it tells you what to change, because it isn’t really about the song.

When you catch the second kind of criticism, the question to ask is what would need to be true for this to be fixable. If there’s an answer, you’ve converted it into something you can use. If there isn’t, you’ve just caught your insecurity impersonating as your craft, and you can get back to work.

Get Someone Else In The Room

Your critic has one permanent flaw… It’s you, so it knows what you meant, which means it can’t tell you whether the song communicates it. You’ll hear the line as the thing you intended rather than the thing you wrote.

That’s what other ears are for. A trusted writer, a co-writer, an open mic full of people who don’t owe you anything. You don’t need everyone’s opinion, and you shouldn’t take all of it.

Two or three people whose taste you respect will tell you more in ten minutes than another fortnight of circling it yourself.

The Part That Takes Time

Your relationship with your inner critic will shift as you write more. Early on that inner voice is mostly noise. Later on as it develops, it gets quieter and more accurate, because you’ve built enough craft that the voice has something real to point at.

A well-trained inner critic is a sign you’ve done the work. The goal isn’t to get rid of the voice inside your head. The goal is to get it to shut up until the draft is done, then let it earn its place.

How do you handle yours? Have you found a split between writing and editing that actually holds?

Let me know. I’d be interested to hear how you do it.

Share your love
Corey Stewart
Corey Stewart
Articles: 289

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *